Three Point Shot – July 2022 | Proskauer Rose LLP

The Justice of the Peace outlined a number of elements that led to the choice to grant Penn State’s movement for abstract judgment. The Justice of the Peace divided Penn State’s claims into two essential classes: Trademark claims associated to infringement and unfair competitors (Half A) and Trademark Counterfeit claims together with cybersquatting (Half B).

Within the dialogue for Half A, the Justice of the Peace simply concluded that Parshall willfully infringed Penn State’s federally protected registered emblems in violation of the Lanham Act and likewise was responsible for trademark dilution in that Parshall chosen the infringing marks with the intention of creating shoppers imagine he and his enterprise have been affiliated with Penn State.

Comments

0 comments

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *