In rulings on two different factors, the appellate courtroom discovered that the trial courtroom erred in denying Plaintiff’s movement to amend his grievance so as to add an extra declare in opposition to the college and Coach Altman for negligent supervision. The Court docket additionally dominated that the decrease courtroom ought to have granted Plaintiff’s movement for abstract judgment concerning the Defendants’ protection of “comparative fault/contributory negligence,” given the shortage of proof to assist their argument.
The ball is now in UO’s courtroom to determine if they may try and attraction to Oregon’s Supreme Court docket, proceed to litigate, or else meet in mid-court to debate a attainable settlement.
Comments
0 comments